But his works could hardly be described as propaganda either.

The term is used in describing corresponding works of art.

He does not describe his works but lets them sink in.

His later works, up to present time can be described as abstract-expressive.

To describe his works as energetic would be true, but insufficient.

Numerous publications have been written describing him and his works.

He has been called 'the painter of light' and his works were described as 'nostalgic' even in the 1950s.

Both described works contain no internal reference to their title.

His early works were described by critics as "comedy of menace".

He ran through basic parameters in observing art and had students practice describing works.