In its courses the university teachers that humans are rational, creative individuals with free will.

In such situations, unrestricted choices by rational individuals often yield results that no one favors.

By making racism into some financial decision on the part of rational individuals is not only wrong, but insulting.

Hence, mutual recognition of rational individuals turns out to be a condition necessary for the individual 'I' in general.

But if R 0, the costs outweigh the benefits and a strictly rational individual would not be expected to vote.

Within these contexts, it is the capacity of a rational individual to make an informed, un-coerced decision.

The mistake they made was to deal with you as a rational individual.

The neo-Classical answer hinges on its view of rational individuals.

This discussion has been conducted almost entirely for self-interested rational individuals.

I am a rational individual who believes in God; do not ask me how.