Rosetta's relatively minor performance penalty therefore took many by surprise.

However there may be a performance penalty for this approach.

Certainly the fancier they are, the more they're doing, the more performance penalty you're going to have.

Though it worked correctly, the method imposed a huge performance penalty.

Nominally, there is a performance penalty for using registered memory.

I actually didn't bother with that, and I just saw no performance penalty.

The addition of the locker imposes no performance penalties on the aircraft.

This is bound to impose a performance penalty on some activities.

Indirect addressing does carry a performance penalty due to the extra memory access involved.

Therefore, you only pay the performance penalty at the start, and the rest is not slowed down.