We are busy and want material in the original article.

The original article has since been taken down by Richards.

Another issue for me emerged after the original article was published.

Was the letter a fresh perspective on the original article?

The references which follow are those used in the writing of the original article.

That sort of info should be in the original article!

The dialogue in the scene was also taken directly from the original article.

Actually, since the original article has now been shown to be trash, perhaps just take it down?

Actually, if you track down the original article it was quite reasonable.

After the original article, no amount of evidence could prove otherwise.