The Court said that the law violated a married couple's constitutional right to privacy.

This is not because the law does violate human rights.

Rather, he said, the law violated the companies' right to due process.

With a majority of 5 judges to 4, the Court determined that the law at issue violated this right.

"In no way were any laws violated as to how they conducted the transaction," he said.

He found that the law violated a woman's right to marital and sexual privacy.

The issue is whether the law violates the clubs' rights of association.

The finding was that the laws do not violate the clause.

Despite this agreement, the Commission holds to its position that these laws violate the law of nations.

The court unanimously held that the law violated freedom of speech.