In the 1995-1996 school year the district had 28% low income students.

In the 2005-2006 school year the district had 55% low income students.

Performance for the lowest income students has also improved.

Some low income students have to work and study at the same time.

Instead, it was argued that the school choice promoted social mobility and increased test scores especially in the cases of low income students.

More than 1,250 academically successful and low income students are able to receive free lunch every day.

She states that lower income students are set up to fail and thus closes their window of opportunity.

The student population has 36.0% low income students and 36.7% with limited proficiency in English.

I see this post saying we should use a factor of lower income students to determine scholarships.

Low income students generally lose about 2 months of reading achievement.