The past is a foreign country rich in treasure but poorly defended.

"Being friends is no reason to share millions of dollars in found treasure."

Its massive impact in blood and treasure will be debated into foreseeable future.

That was more than enough to hold a king's ransom in treasure.

One way or the other, the United States will pay the biggest share of the costs, in blood and treasure.

Do American interests justify "such a commitment in blood and treasure"?

So far it has proved very expensive in treasure and lives.

It was great in treasure, with date gardens and a fort of red silver.

We are beginning to see the cost in blood and treasure of the war in Iraq.

So if there's no gain in treasure, where's the payoff?