I certainly don't remember any Democratic president being presented that way.

The case before us is the first Democratic president in six decades to be elected to two terms.

Without a Democratic president, of course, it will be much harder to turn these bills into law.

This was the first time a Democratic president had attended the annual event.

Republicans love to re member 1980 the only time this century they beat a Democratic president.

However, he now has the opportunity to choose whether to go down in history as a military dictator or a democratic president.

At least all of you have met another Democratic President.

What does it mean for a top presidential adviser to the "democratic" President to speak in this way?

I think we can do that and elect a Democratic president.

Maybe they just wanted to hurt a young Democratic President.