The court argued that unions already existed in the companies involved, and that use of the name Solidarity remained illegal under a 1982 regulation.

The court argued that it was the duty of the state to protect marriage as a public institution.

First, the court argued that the Claim 3 did not pass the machine-or-transformation test because the internet cannot perform the fraud detection steps by itself.

The court argued that there was a choice between educating 60 white children and educating no one.

The court, among other reasons, has argued that requiring such tax collection would place an "undue burden on interstate commerce."

Both lower courts had argued that the intended audience of the magazines (homosexuals) rendered the material obscene.

The court also argued that in certain protected areas, such as public education funding, government grants "may not be used to suppress unpopular expression."

First, the court argued that the state is not allowed to focus on the content of belief, but only on its function:

I personally have a traditional view, but I believe that should be framed in equal rights for everyone, and that's exactly what the court argued.

Oberman is admitted to, has filed appeals in, and argued before all of the Tennessee appellate courts.