I would promote clean coal for the production of electricity.

Then the clean coal, to see exactly what is being shipped.

I seem to recall the greenies a few decades ago saying "clean coal."

I don't think there's any such thing as clean coal.

Can you imagine a climate science paper being taken seriously right next to an ad for clean coal?

A key question is whether more such clean coal is waiting to be found.

President Bush is for it, and indeed has spent years talking up the virtues of "clean coal."

The technology of "clean" coal has also become important.

I suspect the only good that can come from them is some version of clean coal.

It does not include natural gas, nuclear energy or clean coal.