Since 1945 the US military presence has played an important role in keeping the peace.

At present, the two sides cannot even agree a legal basis for the continuation of the US presence into 2009.

The party has often criticized the US military presence in Iraq.

But that need not mean maintaining the U.S. military presence at current levels.

Without the US presence that took place across the -stan countries, these lines would not have been completed.

Such "conflicts that represent little or no military risk" allowing a US presence throughout the world.

This is really a proposal for the legalisation of the US presence.

Ur - one of the few sites protected by a US military presence.

The bloodshed was almost certainly designed to exploit a security vacuum after the end of the US presence.

A limited U.S. presence will be maintained to ensure security.