subsidiarity

We are always talking about subsidiarity here in this House.

There is a lot of talk about subsidiarity at present.

First of all, we would like to call attention to subsidiarity.

And it is more than just a question of subsidiarity.

I do not believe this is a matter for subsidiarity.

By all means let us bring in subsidiarity, but we really must take some sort of action.

There is a whole body of evidence on subsidiarity; I should just like to make one very important point.

We need to have subsidiarity here so that some countries may go ahead and continue to pay them.

This is why we need to develop a new culture of subsidiarity.

If ever there was a subsidiarity issue, this should be it.

I would like to make a last comment on subsidiarity.

That is, after all, what happens when you have a system of subsidiarity.

We are dealing, in fact, with an issue of subsidiarity.

The common good and the principle of subsidiarity are key.

The question of subsidiarity must also be considered in this respect.

Subsidiarity creates two problems to which we must pay particular attention.

In any case the compensation issue is a subject of subsidiarity.

Today, more than ever, there is a vital need for subsidiarity.

We are therefore talking about two kinds of subsidiarity here.

The first and most important principle is that of subsidiarity.

Subsidiarity means deciding which level of decision making is best.

But there is still a long way to go in defining subsidiarity.

The second point I wish to make concerns the whole question of subsidiarity.

If subsidiarity is to mean anything at all, such priorities should be for local decision.

Even in protecting the environment, subsidiarity must be the order of the day.