strategic partnership

Obviously we all support the development of a strategic partnership with India.

We are moving from strategic partnership to a neighbourhood strategy.

Honourable Members, what does the strategic partnership mean for us?

The president's trip has led to talk in India of a new strategic partnership.

But a strategic partnership is not about thinking alike on each and every matter.

To achieve this, we must continue to work on the development of our strategic partnership.

The resolution also calls on the Commission to set up a strategic partnership.

It would be an important contribution to the development of the strategic partnership.

However, strategic partnerships, as we understand them, are based on common values, respect for democracy and human rights.

I would just like to stress that the strategic partnership of which you spoke is very important to us.

Our big mistake was in assuming we would have a strategic partnership.

That strategic partnership must be rooted in economic and political freedom.

The two leaders announced a "strategic partnership" and said they would double trade within five years.

As I have already said, the strategic partnership is a framework within which all the important issues will be discussed.

I should like to point out that this report avoids terms such as strategic partnership.

The two companies have formed a strategic partnership; financial terms were not disclosed.

Yes to the "strategic partnership" desired by the Chinese leadership.

This must be maintained as a top priority of our strategic partnership.

The new situation, represented by strategic partnership agreements, must be taken into account.

A strategic partnership with Qualcomm, has also brought about changes.

I am very much in favour of establishing a strategic partnership with this major economic player.

We should make the strategic partnership closer, deeper and broader.

Separate websites and strategic partnerships are to be further developed.

So my view is that the potential we have for a strategic partnership is quite strong.

Isn't a President entitled to such information before proposing a "strategic partnership"?