routing protocol

It must also support the routing protocols being used in the core.

Also, it does not involve any access to the Internet routing protocols.

For more information see the list of ad-hoc routing protocols.

This should be expanded into a treatment of all the compatible routing protocols.

See the more detailed description below comparing these routing protocols.

This way information about network routes is exchanged among different routing protocols.

This is used in some routing protocols that use radio frequency transmission.

A routing protocol shares this information first among immediate neighbors, and then throughout the network.

As of 2009, the project supports the following routing protocols:

The control plane makes sure the data plane works, by running routing protocols and doing management.

The information is different than that exchanged by link-state routing protocols.

Many software implementations exist for most of the common routing protocols.

These mechanisms were used in the first link-state routing protocols (1978).

It belongs to the same basic family of distance-vector routing protocols.

For example, Internet routing protocols often use gossip-like information exchanges.

For other alternatives see the Ad hoc routing protocols list.

Reactive routing protocols do not maintain routes, but build them on demand.

A new routing protocol for the reconfigurable wireless networks.

The ad hoc routing protocol list contains a large set of alternatives.

Both use a routing protocol and routing table to determine the best path.

One or more routing protocols suitable to the actual network physical topology are required.

This process requires a complex model that simulates the behavior of the network equipment and routing protocols.

Administrative distance defines the reliability of a routing protocol.

It is still in use as an interior routing protocol, in small sites with simple requirements.

Improvements in the software allowed new tables to be loaded, but the network never used dynamic routing protocols.