nomenclatorial , auch: nomenclatural

This taxon is the product of a nomenclatorial dispute.

This genus has a somewhat convoluted nomenclatorial and taxonomic history.

Experts debate a number of nomenclatorial problems with the classification of bentonite clays.

Although a number of articles have used the latter name, Podaxis is the preferred name as it has nomenclatorial priority due to its earlier appearance.

Oken's idiosyncratic nomenclatorial ways, however, aroused the scorn of a number of zoological systematists.

The nomenclatorial treatment of wild and domestic forms has been inconsistent and varied between authors and even within the works of single authors.

In 1946 Alexander H. Smith and Rolf Singer proposed to conserve the name Marasmius over Micromphale; the latter had nomenclatorial priority as it was published first.

If it is in fact the same species, the first published name (i.e., G. indicum) has nomenclatorial priority according to the rules of the International Code of Botanical Nomenclature.

The ICZN does not require that the name of the person who changed the genus be given, nor the date on which the change was made, although nomenclatorial catalogs usually include such information.

As in the early twenty-first century the feather was seen as the type specimen, this would have created significant nomenclatorial confusion because the name Archaeopteryx should then no longer be applied to the skeletons.

Due to a nomenclatorial dispute, the generic name Scops is not used by either the scops or the screech owls (which when only a few species were known were placed together), nor by any other animal.

As this would include the type genus of the latter, this would lead to a nomenclatorial problem requiring ICZN intervention (Cibois 2003b) and was, at that time, not sensible in any case as the phylogeny of the remaining Old World warblers had not been fully resolved either.