market failure

But should market failure be the only reason for government intervention?

In this event there is said to be market failure.

The result has been market failure unlike anything I remember seeing.

"Is there a market failure that the government can correct?"

On the supply side, there are two main sources of market failure.

Central to environmental economics is the concept of market failure.

For example to promote education and learning, support a free press, deal with market failure etc.

Such a case is a type of market failure and results in workers being paid less than their marginal value.

This is because they address the symptom, not the cause of financial market failures.

A healthy government has to have the strength to correct market failures.

Poor distribution of goods has also been identified as a market failure.

I've noted it before: piracy is evidence of a market failure.

"At the moment there's a massive market failure," he said.

We now list the possible sources of distortions that lead to market failure.

This means that there is an enormous potential role for government to correct these market failures.

"Americans' rapid weight gain may have nothing to do with market failure," the article says.

The report is optimistic that intervention can work once market failures are identified.

We also wanted market failures to be better understood.

This means we only work in areas that cannot be done by others for reasons of impartiality, national security or market failure.

"Without 9/11, the same market failure would have people angrier at you," he said.

The Federal government can correct this potential market failure.

According to them, market failures and natural monopolies could be problematic.

What are the market failures that might justify government intervention through industrial policy?

Why are all governments so useless at regulating clear cases of market failure?

In economics, "moral hazard" as a special kind of market failure.