law gazette

According to an article in the Law Gazette in 1992, the case was influential in launching his career.

It publishes the Law Gazette and operates a scheme for needy people to benefit from legal services free-of-charge.

He told the Law Gazette that the site did not bother him and that he had added a link to his CV.

Today the governmental version of newly passed statutes and treaties are officially published in the Internet, the law gazette thus is not available in a printed version anymore.

It was after these cases that the Law Gazette described him as "the patron solicitor of previously lost causes", a label which has stuck with him throughout his career.

Tsubouchi was also an Associate Director of the Japanese Canadian Cultural Centre, and was a frequent contributor to the Law Gazette.

The Law Gazette of the GDR (Gesetzblatt der DDR) was also published by the Council.

One of Mansfield's nominators elaborated to the Law Gazette on why the barrister was standing: "Is it too rude to call (Lord Sainsbury) a plutocrat?

Amendment to the constitution or new law have to be adopted by Parliament, signed by both the Prince and the head of government, and published in the Principality's Law Gazette.

A frequent contributor to the Malayan Law Journal and the Singapore Law Gazette, particularly on criminal law and constitutional matters, a number of his legal articles provoked controversy.

As he explained to the Law Gazette in 2005, he had issued but not actually served the writ, but the statement had the effect that other newspapers did not follow up on the story in detail.

Senior Counsel KS Rajah wrote an article in Law Gazette, raising question on whether the Court of Appeal's recent death sentencing on two men for murder charges constitutes double jeopardy, thereby violating Singapore Constitution Article 11.

The Law Society Gazette (also known as the Gazette or the Law Gazette) is a British weekly trade magazine for solicitors in England and Wales published by the Law Society of England and Wales.

An article in the August 2003 issue of the Law Gazette entitled "The Unconstitutional Punishment", which argued that the mandatory death penalty in Singapore was contrary to the Constitution of Singapore, was obliquely criticized by the Chief Justice Yong Pung How.

Another Law Gazette article published in January 2006 which argued that the Court of Appeal's conviction of two men accused of murder who had been acquitted by the High Court violated the constitutional protection against double jeopardy was said by the Ministry of Law to be "legally flawed".