The second change would be to make the insider dealing law more effective.

Insider dealing provides a route by which they may do so.

Over the last 12 years, there have been just 28 previous insider dealing trials.

They stand to benefit little from the insider dealing prohibition.

Many small investors have suffered as a result of market abuse and insider dealing.

It is on this basis that many see insider dealing as morally wrong.

Since 2003 we have had a directive on insider dealing and market manipulation.

The case is vital to the offence of insider dealing.

The idea that insider dealing is unfair commands widespread support.

His conclusion, therefore, is that insider dealing should be allowed, indeed encouraged.

For insider dealing does not lack victims but rather, credible plaintiffs.

Two advantages follow from permitting insider dealing on this basis.

Critics, though few will speak on record, say he is a master of insider dealing and quiet profit taking.

Yet most countries now have rules against insider dealing, not least because it can put outside investors off securities markets.

In all countries, insider dealing will continue as long as profits can be made from it.

As we shall see, such a basis exists for regulating insider dealing.

Some of the investors say unscrupulous insider dealing had more to do with the situation than luck.

One potential pitfall is the lack of rules for disclosure or insider dealing.

The trial and conviction of top Scottish analyst on insider dealing charges was one.

This is aimed at preventing insider dealing and promoting market transparency.

But what is so bad about insider dealing?

Secondly, there is a very high risk factor attached to insider dealing as a form of compensation.

Whether this subsection applies to insider dealing is very questionable.

Many of Russia's early privatizations were tainted by insider dealing.

Yet there has also been dismay that concern over insider dealing may threaten the flow of information.

Insider dealing provides a route by which they may do so.

Insider dealing can carry a jail sentence of up to seven years.

His conclusion, therefore, is that insider dealing should be allowed, indeed encouraged.

"The maximum sentence for insider dealing is seven years," says one lawyer.

Insider dealing carries a maximum jail term of seven years.

For insider dealing does not lack victims but rather, credible plaintiffs.

The idea that insider dealing is unfair commands widespread support.

Because the art market isn’t regulated like financial securities, insider dealing is generally not illegal.

In all countries, insider dealing will continue as long as profits can be made from it.

The general consensus of opinion is that a successful action under s.62 for insider dealing will be hard to sustain.

“Tackling market abuse and insider dealing is not just an issue for the regulator.

Some of the investors say unscrupulous insider dealing had more to do with the situation than luck.

At first blush the argument in favour of insider dealing was seductive.

Today insider dealing is regarded as a serious offence in the lexicon of financial crime.

Yet there has also been dismay that concern over insider dealing may threaten the flow of information.

Whether this subsection applies to insider dealing is very questionable.

Insider dealing carries a maximum of seven years imprisonment, although sentences are usually much lower.

But there are still grumbles that much insider dealing goes unpunished.

Insider dealing may likewise be justified on this basis.

Determining the costs and benefits of regulating insider dealing is by no means a straightforward task.

The changing nature of insider dealing is well illustrated by Chiarella v.

'Look, insider dealing is regarded as the downside of legal nowadays.

Insider dealing has been the focus of regulatory attention on both sides of the Atlantic for some time now.

The traditional view of insider dealing is succinctly outlined by Hannigan.

In his opinion, insider dealing provides a better and more efficient mechanism for channelling information into the market.

Talking of insider trading – more than you ever wanted to know.

And what did you see in the insider trading cases?

And here we had given them the most important insider trading case in our history.

But more to the point: Insider trading is one thing.

How is this not, on its face, evidence of insider trading?

Members of Congress are already subject to insider trading laws.

If companies tell us more, insider trading will be worth less.

Another international deal appears to have an insider trading problem.

With insider trading, the answer until now was always simple: the crime came first.

In many countries, insider trading with secret information is against the law and thought to be a bad thing to do.

Since then his office has charged more than 45 people with insider trading.

But he also described insider trading as “rampant” in a speech last year.

Fighting insider trading has become “the single most important task we have”.

They face a second trial on charges of insider trading.

What happened next is the heart of the insider trading dispute.

The company has an insider trading policy for all employees, she noted.

One risk to the market maker would be insider trading.

I was not going to risk a good job to commit insider trading.

It is believed to be the largest insider trading case.

It works something like insider trading on the stock exchange.

It really was a beautiful set up. Insider trading is the way to make millions with very little risk.

American officials are investigating whether there was any insider trading.

So what would be the modern equivalent of a movie with insider trading?

Insider trading cases can be difficult for the government to prove at trial.

Second, the market would have been monitored for evidence of insider trading.