Weitere Beispiele werden automatisch zu den Stichwörtern zugeordnet - wir garantieren ihre Korrektheit nicht.
The Divisional Court may make any order as it sees fit.
The Divisional Court responded to this argument in two ways.
Unsurprisingly, the Divisional Court did not think this was enough.
However, the basis for that was not a matter for the Divisional Court.
The case would now go back to the Divisional Court for the amount of damages to be determined.
On the prosecutor's appeal to the Divisional Court this decision was in turn reversed.
The ambit of the 1976 order has twice been considered by the Divisional Court.
The legality of such a procedure was upheld in the Divisional Court.
On review of the decision, the Divisional Court agreed, and upheld the order for disclosure.
That is where the reasoning of the Divisional Court inexorably leads.
The Divisional Court expressed its conclusion in the following terms:
The Divisional Court agreed that assault cannot be committed by an omission.
Finally they refused to pay and a Divisional Court held that they were not liable to do so.
Her appeal to the Divisional Court was rejected.
The representative plaintiff appealed that decision to the Divisional Court, but the appeal was dismissed.
The Divisional Court has stated that this power applies in three circumstances:
It was held by the Divisional Court that his appeal against conviction of the obstruction offence must be allowed.
The tenant then applied to the Divisional Court by way of judicial review to quash the judge's decision.
The following additional cases were cited in argument in the Divisional Court:
No doubt the Divisional Court would often wish to read the document first before ordering its disclosure wholly or in part.
The Divisional Court found that the by-laws did in fact adversely impinge upon just such rights.
Counsel took the case on for nothing and, on appeal, the Divisional Court found that the crime did not exist.
The applicant seeks to uphold the judgment of the Divisional Court on two quite different grounds.
The decisions of this court are binding on all inferior courts trying civil or criminal cases, including divisional courts.
The Board of Education applied for judicial review to the divisional court, who then quashed the ruling.