Weitere Beispiele werden automatisch zu den Stichwörtern zugeordnet - wir garantieren ihre Korrektheit nicht.
For publishers and database owners, they are valuable intellectual property.
You can add database owner accounts after database creation.
In seeking to protect the property of database owners, this bill goes too far in a number of respects.
Every database requires a database owner account that can perform all schema management operations.
The database owner and permitted users are allowed to create tables as they wish, within the database and may share access to these as they wish.
Database access controls are set by special authorized (by the database owner) personnel that uses dedicated protected security DBMS interfaces.
Many database owners want a federal law to ensure that their data collections are not duplicated and sold by others trying to get a free ride on what they spent time and money to compile.
But its broad language goes too far in limiting the reuse of factual information contained in a protected database, and in allowing a database owner to control future uses of that information.
But, they say, publishers are illegally making the work available to new, paying audiences through electronic database owners like Lexis-Nexis and companies like University Microfilms International, which put the archives on CD-ROM's.
H.R. 354, a bill sponsored by Representative Howard Coble, leans too much in the direction of protecting the proprietary interests of database owners at the expense of keeping facts in the public domain.
But in protecting the labors of database owners, Congress must be careful not to limit the use of facts that should remain in the public domain, a restriction that could be far worse than any problem the legislation is seeking to cure.
If the schema has not been specified, then the system will check to see if the current user has a table of this name, and if not, it will then check if the database owner has a table of this name.
This has not stopped database owners lobbying for the introduction of such a right, but so far bills to introduce it in the U.S. have been prevented by the successful lobbying of research libraries, consumer groups and firms who benefit from the free use of factual information.
