cosmic censorship hypothesis

If correct, this would provide a counterexample to the cosmic censorship hypothesis.

This is referred to as the cosmic censorship hypothesis.

In 1969, he conjectured the cosmic censorship hypothesis.

The cosmic censorship hypothesis says that a naked singularity cannot arise in our universe from realistic initial conditions.

The weak and the strong cosmic censorship hypothesis are two conjectures concerned with the global geometry of spacetimes.

The weak cosmic censorship hypothesis asserts there can be no singularity visible from future null infinity.

The cosmic censorship hypothesis rules out the formation of such singularities, when they are created through the gravitational collapse of realistic matter.

A naked singularity could allow scientists to observe an infinitely dense material, which would under normal circumstances be impossible by the cosmic censorship hypothesis.

University, 145 Cosmic Censorship Hypothesis.

The weak and the strong cosmic censorship hypotheses are two mathematical conjectures about the structure of singularities arising in general relativity.

The weak cosmic censorship hypothesis conjectures that no naked singularities other than the Big Bang singularity exist in the universe.

It seemed neat and logical, and has become known as the Cosmic Censorship Hypothesis - the idea that nature abhors a naked singularity.

The original physical argument that led Penrose to conjecture such an inequality invoked the Hawking area theorem and the Cosmic censorship hypothesis.

This remarkable fact led Roger Penrose to propose the cosmic censorship hypothesis, which might be paraphrased as "God abhors a naked singularity."

Some research has suggested that if loop quantum gravity is correct, then naked singularities could exist in nature, implying that the cosmic censorship hypothesis does not hold.

The strong cosmic censorship hypothesis asserts that, generically, general relativity is a deterministic theory, in the same sense that classical mechanics is a deterministic theory.

Roberts, Mark D. : Scalar Field Counter-Examples to the Cosmic Censorship Hypothesis.

Small wonder that Will says that 'one of the most important unsolved issues in classical general relativity is the validity (and even the meaning) of the Cosmic Censorship Hypothesis.'

Failure of the cosmic censorship hypothesis leads to the failure of determinism, because it is yet impossible to predict the behavior of space-time in the causal future of a singularity.

The cosmic censorship hypothesis states that all realistic future singularities (no perfect symmetries, matter with realistic properties) are safely hidden away behind a horizon, and thus invisible to all distant observers.

Clifford Will summed the situation up in his contribution to the volume The New Physics (edited by Paul Davies): 'There is no convincing proof of the Cosmic Censorship Hypothesis.

Such a metric has several seemingly unphysical properties, such as the ring's violation of the cosmic censorship hypothesis, and also appearance of causality-violating closed timelike curves in the immediate vicinity of the ring.

Additionally, in a 2007 paper, Petters and Werner found a system of equations that can be applied to test the Cosmic Censorship Hypothesis observationally using the realistic case of lensing by a Kerr black hole.

Piran's work include also contributions to the general theory of relativity such as one of the strongest counter examples to the cosmic censorship hypothesis and the demonstration of instability of the inner structure of black hole .

The strong version of the cosmic censorship hypothesis states that in a realistic solution, the singularities would always lie either entirely in the future (like the singularities of gravitational collapse) or entirely in the past (like the big bang).