consequential loss

There is also no cover for consequential loss under this service.

Please note that you are not covered for consequential loss under this service.

Consequential loss is not covered when discussing the issue of compensation.

We must ask you to stand the first £100 of any consequential loss.

There must of course be no consequential loss of quality.

Because the new engines were much larger, there was a consequential loss of some cargo space.

The claimant may also be entitled to any consequential losses.

Industry sources say consequential loss claims could prove a greater burden than the building repair costs.

However, insurance cover doesn't normally extend to protecting consequential loss.

Please note that Fedex will not pay for consequential loss.

You are not covered for consequential loss.

If so, that potential defendant will be liable to pay damages for all the injuries caused and the consequential losses.

For an extra fee, at the time of posting at your post office, we can arrange cover against consequential loss.

However, there are conditions where claims for consequential loss are considered under the direct debit guarantee.

That's a consequential loss.

Fiber failures can be very expensive, both in terms of the direct cost of repair, and consequential loss of service.

Nominal damages are awarded where a legal wrong has been committed but no consequential loss has been caused.

Free consequential loss cover from £100-£10,000.

The agency will require full financial details for 'consequential loss'(loss of business as a result of the bomb).

To what extent is T N T liable for indirect or consequential loss?

These damages, being delictual in character, are measured according to the plaintiff's negative interest and include compensation for consequential losses.

Consequential loss can be where delay or loss of a letter or package could involve you in additional expense over and above its actual value.

It is backed by a £15 million insurance warranty covering product liability on defective material, damage to property and consequential losses.

Therefore, the test for remoteness should be more generous than in tort, where consequential losses must be very remote to preclude compensation.

One is not entitled to a claim for one's consequential loss (id quod interesse) in terms of this remedy.