Security Council resolution

Security Council resolution 1546, which established the political process in Iraq.

It was the first Security Council resolution on the conflict.

But it has no firm basis in any Security Council resolution.

The only question is whether earlier Security Council resolutions provide that authority, he said.

They have nothing to do with implementation of Security Council resolutions.

It was the final Security Council resolution adopted in 2001.

There must be full implementation of all the Security Council resolutions.

Only nine votes are needed to pass a Security Council resolution.

"We would like to seek a Security Council resolution," said an administration official.

Israel has violated Security Council resolutions every year since 1967.

But it's not the first nation to violate Security Council resolutions.

This promise was included in the text of Security Council resolution 1701.

The second objection centers on the need for a Security Council resolution.

For him the UN security council resolution is a runway to war.

That would raise the question of military action to enforce Security Council resolutions.

"I am not giving any discounts on Security Council resolutions," he said.

Today's Security Council resolution does not explicitly authorize military force.

Iraq needs to be held strictly to the arms control and other provisions of Security Council resolutions.

Its mandate is to use force only against those who violate Security Council resolutions.

Much will depend on negotiations over what form an additional Security Council resolution might take.

The president dismissed the Security Council resolution as "a piece of torn paper."

They have already rejected the new Security Council resolution.

The side that says no seems likely to face a second Security Council resolution, imposing an arms embargo.

But at the end of the day, given the world as it is, a Security Council resolution is a must.

What is being done about applying Security Council Resolution 1244?