I believe, said Protagoras, that the world in general would answer as you do.

Well, you ask, and how will Protagoras reinforce his position?

In this respect his views on law are similar to those of Protagoras.

It has been questioned ever since the time of Protagoras.

How then, Protagoras, would you have us treat the argument?

For Protagoras is generally at home, and we shall be sure to find him; never fear.

Protagoras was one of the best-known and most successful teachers.

Such ideas did exist, however, in the works of his contemporary Protagoras.

And the truth of Protagoras being doubted by all, will be true neither to himself to any one else?

He drew nearer to me and said: Protagoras is come.

What will Protagoras make of you, if you go to see him?

I do not think that they have, said Protagoras.

However, Protagoras was referring to things that are used by or in some way related to humans.

Protagoras himself was an historical character, as (most probably) are all those who take part in the dialogue.

Protagoras's idea that there are two sides to everything.

Along with Protagoras, he forms the first generation of sophists.

In some other respects the Protagoras rather offers a contrast than a parallel.

It is clear, though, that scholars from protagoras to the nineteenth century would not have agreed with this.

Protagoras states that he has two good pieces of evidence that people agree with him.

Had not Protagoras something of the same sort?

Then, Protagoras, which of the two assertions shall we renounce?

I said staring; Protagoras was reckoned to be at least eighty years old.

They show us that as the philosopher Protagoras said, “Man is the measure of all things”.

In the Protagoras, he declares by fiat that no one can know good and yet choose to do evil.

Say rather, with the wisest of all living men, if you are willing to accord that title to Protagoras.