James-Lange theory

These findings are consistent with the James-Lange theory of emotion.

The theory became known as the James-Lange theory of emotion.

Modern views on the causation of emotions begin with what is called the James-Lange theory.

Working independently, they developed the James-Lange theory, a hypothesis on the origin and nature of emotions.

(This is somewhat parallel to the James-Lange theory of emotion.)

The James-Lange theory of emotion was produced.

The James-Lange Theory is a hypothesis about emotions.

The James-Lange theory posits that emotional experience is largely due to the experience of bodily changes.

According to James-Lange theory, the conscious experience of emotion occurs after the cortex receives signals about changes in physiological state.

This contradicts the James-Lange theory because James believed that the viscera is the center of emotion.

The James-Lange theory contends that such affective responses result from reverberations from the viscera.

This refutes the James-Lange theory.

For the James-Lange theory of emotion, "emotions are by-products of bodily reactions elicited by a situation."

Cannon identified and outlined five issues with the James-Lange theory's notion of the vasomotor center as the explanation of emotional experience.

The James-Lange Theory describes how emotion is caused by the bodily changes which come from the perception of the emotionally arousing experience or environment.

It is also very important in emotion, and has been included as a part of many influential theories such as the James-Lange theory of emotion.

The James-Lange theory of emotion was proposed by psychologist William James and physiologist Carl Lange.

'Somebody should've told them about the James-Lange theory of emotions - we don't run because we're afraid but we're afraid because we run.

The James-Lange theory refers to a hypothesis on the origin and nature of emotions and is one of the earliest theories of emotion within modern psychology.

The Danish psychologist Carl Lange also proposed a similar theory at around the same time, and therefore this theory became known as the James-Lange theory.

Although mostly abandoned in its original form, Tim Dalgleish argues that most contemporary neuroscientists have embraced the components of the James-Lange theory of emotions.

James is one of the two namesakes of the James-Lange theory of emotion, which he formulated independently of Carl Lange in the 1880s.

Therefore, if these visceral changes were artificially induced by the injection of adrenalin, one would expect the emotions to follow, as articulated by the James-Lange theory of emotion.

The James-Lange theory fails because it ignores what philosophers call the intentionality of emotion - that is, what emotions are about, their representational content, which are generally things outside the body.

Removal of this system resulted in the abolishment of all the reactions under control of the vasomotor center, the region that the James-Lange theory purported to be responsible for emotional experiences.