With a gross player in the game, the back end's funny money anyway.
Anybody who will take this funny money will know a lot about it.
The amount of funny money involved was not great, as counterfeiting cases go.
It does not run on "funny money," as you assert.
But since the whole system runs on funny money, there is no deeper logic to this tax break.
See if they can dig up some funny money?
But then, returning funny money is par for the course in presidential campaigns.
I'd simply wind up in jail for trying to shove funny money.
I mean, there's some funny money placed when he's scheduled to go.
What could be more credible than the President's own statement suggesting there was funny money in the campaign?
