exclusion clause

There is no nuclear exclusion clause in health insurance policies.

Chapter 10 deals with the position where one of the terms is an exclusion clause.

The policy is subject to the war exclusion clause.

Further up the chain there may be an exclusion clause which would prevent any contract action.

This exclusion clause was considered to be unreasonable on the basis of the following factors.

There is no general power to strike down unreasonable exclusion clauses.

In this situation, the exclusion clause is only valid if agreed to after the start of arbitration.

The case concerned the scope of an exclusion clause in a maritime insurance policy.

The final step is to evaluate whether the exclusion clause should not be enforced on public policy grounds.

The consequences of this Exclusion Clause are quite far reaching.

They therefore developed a number of rules to restrict reliance on exclusion clauses.

Those rules were largely developed in cases concerned with exclusion clauses, and they obviously apply here.

These rules on interpretation are like exclusion clauses themselves.

Thus the exclusion clause in favour of the trustee was allowed.

Further along, in small print, an exclusion clause was stated:

Well, like for instance what about these exclusions clauses.

There are other differences, for example, as regards the statutory controls over exclusion clauses.

They had an exclusion clause (see below, and MA 1967 s 3).

The courts have traditionally held that exclusion clauses only operate if they are actually part of the contract.

Where the Act does apply it seeks to regulate all the different types of exclusion clause which may be found in a contract.

The exclusion clause was of no effect for this breach of an express term.

They were to be treated as exclusion clauses.

In Precedent 1 this exclusion clause is set out in cl 9.3.

He also argued that the exclusion clause was valid, and was reasonable.

It shows an example of a very hostile interpretation of exclusion clauses.