The point is rather to stress the limits of state action.
The new federal policy clears the way for such state action.
Only in a case of "state discriminatory action" would the federal government have a role to play.
And through state action to help those who need it most.
After two years of waiting on Washington, the pressure is great for state action.
Not everything that happens in a courtroom is state action.
He said the city would get much of the added $500 million from state actions or perhaps find other savings.
I would say to anyone who supports state action, just take a look at how the west functions.
The stuff that didn't need state action has been done.
The review of state action is carried out in the local people's court.
